# ezbookkeeping vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ezbookkeeping | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 62 in Personal Finance | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 863 | 118 269 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +215 | +5 910 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 71/100 for ezbookkeeping, so it is the safer default.

ezbookkeeping ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, ezbookkeeping is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 910 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ezbookkeeping](https://selfhost.directory/project/ezbookkeeping) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ezbookkeeping.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ezbookkeeping-vs-tradingagents