# ezbookkeeping vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ezbookkeeping | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 62 in Personal Finance | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 852 | 45 030 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +204 | +1 629 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v6.0.8 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 71/100 for ezbookkeeping, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for ezbookkeeping.

If you want the quickest setup, ezbookkeeping is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ezbookkeeping](https://selfhost.directory/project/ezbookkeeping) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ezbookkeeping.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ezbookkeeping-vs-reactive-resume