# ezbookkeeping vs facto

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ezbookkeeping | facto |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 62 in Personal Finance | #7 of 11 in Accounting |
| GitHub stars | 5 850 ✓ | 372 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +206 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.1.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v4.32 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Scala |

## Which one should you pick?

ezbookkeeping scores 71/100 against 44/100 for facto, so it is the safer default.

ezbookkeeping ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for facto.

If you want the quickest setup, ezbookkeeping is easier to run; facto needs more configuration.

ezbookkeeping is growing faster right now (+206 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ezbookkeeping](https://selfhost.directory/project/ezbookkeeping) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ezbookkeeping.md)
- [facto](https://selfhost.directory/project/facto) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/facto.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ezbookkeeping-vs-facto