# Ezarr vs Mastodon

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ezarr | Mastodon |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #42 of 118 in Media Server | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 1 090 | 50 456 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 38 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Mastodon scores 82/100 against 55/100 for Ezarr, so it is the safer default.

Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Ezarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Ezarr is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.

Mastodon is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ezarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/ezarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ezarr.md)
- [Mastodon](https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mastodon.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ezarr-vs-mastodon