# exportarr vs GoAccess

> Two self-hosted [Monitoring & observability projects](https://selfhost.directory/monitoring), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exportarr | GoAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 51 in Monitoring & observability | #1 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 831 | 21 093 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +145 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C |

## Which one should you pick?

GoAccess scores 75/100 against 59/100 for exportarr, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, exportarr is easier to run; GoAccess needs more configuration.

GoAccess is growing faster right now (+145 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exportarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/exportarr-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exportarr-2.md)
- [GoAccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/goaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/goaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exportarr-2-vs-goaccess