# exo vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 25 in LLM Inference | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 48 070 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +447 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 77/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for exo.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+447 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-windows-arm