# exo vs UrBackup

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 25 in LLM Inference | #18 of 46 in Backup |
| GitHub stars | 48 070 ✓ | 943 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +447 ✓ | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | 2.5.38 · 30 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 77/100 against 60/100 for UrBackup, so it is the safer default.

UrBackup ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for exo.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; UrBackup needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+447 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [UrBackup](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbackup.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-urbackup