# exo vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in LLM Inference | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 48 090 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +455 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 76/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

exo ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+455 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api