# exo vs unopim

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | unopim |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 6 in Product Management |
| GitHub stars | 48 082 ✓ | 11 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +447 ✓ | +47 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v3.1.3 · 29 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 76/100 against 69/100 for unopim, so it is the safer default.

unopim ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for exo.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; unopim needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+447 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [unopim](https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unopim.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-unopim