# exo vs trip2g

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | trip2g |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in LLM Inference | #30 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 48 092 ✓ | 40 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +457 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v0.12.0 · 19 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 76/100 against 40/100 for trip2g, so it is the safer default.

exo ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for trip2g.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; trip2g needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [trip2g](https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trip2g.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-trip2g