# exo vs Trenova

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | Trenova |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 2 in Fleet Management |
| GitHub stars | 48 071 ✓ | 314 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +448 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v0.10.5 · 13 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 77/100 against 41/100 for Trenova, so it is the safer default.

Trenova ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for exo.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; Trenova needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+448 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [Trenova](https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trenova.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-trenova