# exo vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in LLM Inference | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 48 072 | 117 967 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +437 | +5 608 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 76/100 for exo, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for exo.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 608 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-tradingagents