# exo vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 25 in LLM Inference | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 48 072 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +449 ✓ | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 77/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for exo.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+449 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-openreader