# exo vs mkcertWeb

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | mkcertWeb |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in LLM Inference | #6 of 8 in Certificate Management |
| GitHub stars | 48 071 ✓ | 221 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +436 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v4.4.2 · 15 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 76/100 against 48/100 for mkcertWeb, so it is the safer default.

mkcertWeb ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for exo.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; mkcertWeb needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+436 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [mkcertWeb](https://selfhost.directory/project/mkcertweb) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mkcertweb.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-mkcertweb