# exo vs magic-frame

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | magic-frame |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in LLM Inference | #58 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 48 072 ✓ | 511 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +437 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 76/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.

magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for exo.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; magic-frame needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+437 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [magic-frame](https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/magic-frame.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-magic-frame