# exo vs Lumabri

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | Lumabri |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in LLM Inference | #5 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 48 074 ✓ | 202 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +439 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v0.8.0 · 12 Aug 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 76/100 against 42/100 for Lumabri, so it is the safer default.

exo ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Lumabri.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; Lumabri needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+439 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [Lumabri](https://selfhost.directory/project/lumabri) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lumabri.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-lumabri