# exo vs livekit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | livekit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 48 082 ✓ | 21 913 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +447 | +814 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

livekit scores 80/100 against 76/100 for exo, so it is the safer default.

livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for exo.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [livekit](https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/livekit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-livekit