# exo vs ADAMANT IPFS Node

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | ADAMANT IPFS Node |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 25 in LLM Inference | #8 of 15 in File Storage |
| GitHub stars | 48 071 ✓ | 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +448 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 77/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.

exo ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+448 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [ADAMANT IPFS Node](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-node.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-ipfs-node