# exo vs Healthchecks

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | Healthchecks |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in LLM Inference | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 48 078 ✓ | 10 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +443 ✓ | +106 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for exo.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+443 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-healthchecks