# exo vs Hass-MCP

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | exo | Hass-MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 25 in LLM Inference | #63 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 48 078 ✓ | 351 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +443 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.0.71 · 23 Apr 2026 | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

exo scores 76/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.

Hass-MCP ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for exo.

If you want the quickest setup, exo is easier to run; Hass-MCP needs more configuration.

exo is growing faster right now (+443 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [exo](https://selfhost.directory/project/exo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/exo.md)
- [Hass-MCP](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/exo-vs-hass-mcp