# Excludarr vs Fish Speech

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Excludarr | Fish Speech |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #111 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 232 | 33 461 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +138 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Fish Speech scores 73/100 against 43/100 for Excludarr, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Excludarr is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

Fish Speech is growing faster right now (+138 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Excludarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/excludarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/excludarr.md)
- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/excludarr-vs-fish-speech