excalidrawvsglobalping-probe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| excalidraw | globalping-probe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Whiteboarding | #29 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 134 768 | 215 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 935 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.18.1 · 21 Apr 2026 | v0.54.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | ISC |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
excalidraw scores 91/100 against 48/100 for globalping-probe, so it is the safer default.
globalping-probe ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for excalidraw.
If you want the quickest setup, globalping-probe is easier to run; excalidraw needs more configuration.
excalidraw is growing faster right now (+1 935 stars in 30 days).
excalidraw details →globalping-probe details →
Swap a project
Keep excalidraw, compare it with
Keep globalping-probe, compare it with