excalidraw-self-hostedvsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| excalidraw-self-hosted | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 9 in Whiteboarding | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 168 | 65 377 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +315 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | — | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 40/100 for excalidraw-self-hosted, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for excalidraw-self-hosted.
If you want the quickest setup, nocodb is easier to run; excalidraw-self-hosted needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+315 stars in 30 days).
excalidraw-self-hosted details →nocodb details →
Swap a project
Keep excalidraw-self-hosted, compare it with
Keep nocodb, compare it with