ExcaliDashvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ExcaliDash | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Whiteboarding | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 1 701 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +118 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.6.6 · 22 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 58/100 for ExcaliDash, so it is the safer default.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ExcaliDash.
If you want the quickest setup, ExcaliDash is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
ExcaliDash is growing faster right now (+118 stars in 30 days).
ExcaliDash details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep ExcaliDash, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with