ExcaliDashvsUUSEC WAF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ExcaliDash | UUSEC WAF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Whiteboarding | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 1 700 | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +119 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.6.6 · 22 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
UUSEC WAF scores 59/100 against 58/100 for ExcaliDash, so it is the safer default.
UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ExcaliDash.
If you want the quickest setup, ExcaliDash is easier to run; UUSEC WAF needs more configuration.
ExcaliDash is growing faster right now (+119 stars in 30 days).
ExcaliDash details →UUSEC WAF details →
Swap a project
Keep ExcaliDash, compare it with
Keep UUSEC WAF, compare it with