# ExcaliDash vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ExcaliDash | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Whiteboarding | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 1 703 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +120 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.6.6 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

ExcaliDash scores 58/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

ExcaliDash ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, ExcaliDash is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.

ExcaliDash is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ExcaliDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/excalidash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/excalidash.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/excalidash-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api