# Evidence vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Evidence | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 7 077 ✓ | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +118 ✓ | +101 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 69/100 for Evidence, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Evidence is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Evidence](https://selfhost.directory/project/evidence) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/evidence.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/evidence-vs-zammad