# Evergreen vs OmniVoice-Studio

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Evergreen | OmniVoice-Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 94/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 4 in Library Management | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 157 | 93 418 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +58 144 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 35 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 51/100 for Evergreen, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Evergreen.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Evergreen needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 144 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Evergreen](https://selfhost.directory/project/evergreen) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/evergreen.md)
- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/evergreen-vs-omnivoice-studio