# Evergreen vs Kokoro FastAPI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Evergreen | Kokoro FastAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 4 in Library Management | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 157 | 5 611 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +134 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Kokoro FastAPI scores 69/100 against 51/100 for Evergreen, so it is the safer default.

Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Evergreen.

If you want the quickest setup, Kokoro FastAPI is easier to run; Evergreen needs more configuration.

Kokoro FastAPI is growing faster right now (+134 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Evergreen](https://selfhost.directory/project/evergreen) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/evergreen.md)
- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/evergreen-vs-kokoro-fastapi