# etcd vs voidaccess

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | etcd | voidaccess |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 38 in Databases | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 52 432 ✓ | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +125 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 18 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.7.3 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

etcd scores 83/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.

voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for etcd.

If you want the quickest setup, etcd is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.

etcd is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [etcd](https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd.md)
- [voidaccess](https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/voidaccess.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/etcd-vs-voidaccess