# etcd vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | etcd | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 38 in Databases | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 52 432 ✓ | 39 754 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +125 | +773 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.7.3 · 22 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 83/100 for etcd, so it is the safer default.

Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for etcd.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; etcd needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+773 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [etcd](https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/etcd-vs-umami