# etcd vs rpi-mqtt-monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | etcd | rpi-mqtt-monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 38 in Databases | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 52 432 ✓ | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +125 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.7.3 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

etcd scores 83/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.

etcd ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.

etcd is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [etcd](https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd.md)
- [rpi-mqtt-monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/etcd-vs-rpi-mqtt-monitor