# etcd vs LubeLogger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | etcd | LubeLogger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 38 in Databases | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management |
| GitHub stars | 52 431 ✓ | 2 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +121 ✓ | +69 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.7.3 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

etcd scores 83/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.

LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for etcd.

If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; etcd needs more configuration.

## Details

- [etcd](https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd.md)
- [LubeLogger](https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/lubelogger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/etcd-vs-lubelogger