etcdvsADAMANT IPFS Node
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| etcd | ADAMANT IPFS Node | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 38 in Databases | #8 of 15 in File Storage |
| GitHub stars | 52 432 | 307 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +125 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 1 |
| Latest release | v3.7.3 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.1.0 · 30 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
etcd scores 83/100 against 48/100 for ADAMANT IPFS Node, so it is the safer default.
etcd ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for ADAMANT IPFS Node.
If you want the quickest setup, etcd is easier to run; ADAMANT IPFS Node needs more configuration.
etcd is growing faster right now (+125 stars in 30 days).
etcd details →ADAMANT IPFS Node details →