# etcd vs Hass-MCP

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | etcd | Hass-MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 38 in Databases | #63 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 52 431 ✓ | 351 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +121 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.7.3 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

etcd scores 83/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.

etcd ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Hass-MCP.

etcd is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [etcd](https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd.md)
- [Hass-MCP](https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hass-mcp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/etcd-vs-hass-mcp