# etcd vs firebolt-core

> Two self-hosted [Databases projects](https://selfhost.directory/databases), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | etcd | firebolt-core |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 38 in Databases | #32 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 52 431 ✓ | 256 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +121 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.7.3 · 22 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.31.13-0.20260424104720.5698ca5339fc · 24 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

etcd scores 83/100 against 44/100 for firebolt-core, so it is the safer default.

etcd ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for firebolt-core.

If you want the quickest setup, etcd is easier to run; firebolt-core needs more configuration.

etcd is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [etcd](https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/etcd.md)
- [firebolt-core](https://selfhost.directory/project/firebolt-core) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/firebolt-core.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/etcd-vs-firebolt-core