# ERPNext vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ERPNext | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 2 in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 40 708 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 208 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 73 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v16.53.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

ERPNext scores 85/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

ERPNext ships more often: 73 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; ERPNext needs more configuration.

ERPNext is growing faster right now (+1 208 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ERPNext](https://selfhost.directory/project/erpnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/erpnext.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

## Related comparisons

- [ERPNext vs Twenty](https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-twenty)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/erpnext-vs-uusec-waf