# Ente vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ente | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 29 713 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +668 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Ente scores 81/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

If you want the quickest setup, Ente is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Ente is growing faster right now (+668 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ente](https://selfhost.directory/project/ente) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ente.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ente vs Immich](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-immich)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-wraft