# Ente vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ente | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 29 702 ✓ | 15 908 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +657 ✓ | +11 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Dart | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Ente scores 81/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Ente needs more configuration.

Ente is growing faster right now (+657 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ente](https://selfhost.directory/project/ente) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ente.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ente vs Immich](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-immich)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-transfersh