# Ente vs transcriber

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ente | transcriber |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #10 of 15 in Audio Processing |
| GitHub stars | 29 719 ✓ | 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +659 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Dart | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Ente scores 82/100 against 41/100 for transcriber, so it is the safer default.

Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transcriber.

Ente is growing faster right now (+659 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ente](https://selfhost.directory/project/ente) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ente.md)
- [transcriber](https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transcriber.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ente vs Immich](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-immich)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-transcriber