# Ente vs supabase-automated-self-host

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ente | supabase-automated-self-host |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 29 719 ✓ | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +659 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Ente scores 82/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.

Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.

Ente is growing faster right now (+659 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ente](https://selfhost.directory/project/ente) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ente.md)
- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ente vs Immich](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-immich)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-supabase-automated-self-host