# Ente vs speech-to-phrase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ente | speech-to-phrase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 29 724 ✓ | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +664 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Ente scores 82/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.

Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for speech-to-phrase.

If you want the quickest setup, Ente is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.

Ente is growing faster right now (+664 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ente](https://selfhost.directory/project/ente) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ente.md)
- [speech-to-phrase](https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ente vs Immich](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-immich)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-speech-to-phrase