# Ente vs sandboxed.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ente | sandboxed.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 29 732 ✓ | 678 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +672 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Dart | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Ente scores 82/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.

Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for sandboxed.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, Ente is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.

Ente is growing faster right now (+672 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ente](https://selfhost.directory/project/ente) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ente.md)
- [sandboxed.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ente vs Immich](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-immich)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-sandboxedsh