# Ente vs retroassembly

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ente | retroassembly |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 29 731 ✓ | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +671 ✓ | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Dart | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Ente scores 82/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.

Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.

If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; Ente needs more configuration.

Ente is growing faster right now (+671 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ente](https://selfhost.directory/project/ente) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ente.md)
- [retroassembly](https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/retroassembly.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ente vs Immich](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-immich)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-retroassembly