# Ente vs Questarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ente | Questarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #39 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 29 731 ✓ | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +671 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dart | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Ente scores 82/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.

Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; Ente needs more configuration.

Ente is growing faster right now (+671 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ente](https://selfhost.directory/project/ente) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ente.md)
- [Questarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/questarr.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ente vs Immich](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-immich)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-questarr