# Ente vs imgpush

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Ente | imgpush |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Photo Management | #4 of 9 in Image Management |
| GitHub stars | 29 712 ✓ | 356 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +667 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | ente-cli-v0.4.2 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Dart | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Ente scores 81/100 against 47/100 for imgpush, so it is the safer default.

Ente ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for imgpush.

If you want the quickest setup, imgpush is easier to run; Ente needs more configuration.

Ente is growing faster right now (+667 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Ente](https://selfhost.directory/project/ente) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ente.md)
- [imgpush](https://selfhost.directory/project/imgpush) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/imgpush.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Ente vs Immich](https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-immich)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/ente-vs-imgpush