# Encore vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Encore | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #4 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 12 649 | 16 058 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +164 | +243 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.58.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 72/100 for Encore, so it is the safer default.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Encore.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Encore needs more configuration.

## Details

- [Encore](https://selfhost.directory/project/encore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/encore.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/encore-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap