# Encore vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Encore | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 12 659 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +174 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.58.8 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Encore scores 72/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

Encore ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; Encore needs more configuration.

Encore is growing faster right now (+174 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Encore](https://selfhost.directory/project/encore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/encore.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/encore-vs-unbagrnd