EncorevsTypeType
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Encore | TypeType | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 12 659 | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +174 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.58.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Encore scores 72/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.
TypeType ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Encore.
If you want the quickest setup, Encore is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.
Encore is growing faster right now (+174 stars in 30 days).
Encore details →TypeType details →