# Encore vs transfer.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Encore | transfer.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 14 in Platform as a Service | #9 of 86 in File Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 12 649 | 15 905 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +164 ✓ | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.58.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Encore scores 72/100 against 69/100 for transfer.sh, so it is the safer default.

Encore ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for transfer.sh.

If you want the quickest setup, transfer.sh is easier to run; Encore needs more configuration.

Encore is growing faster right now (+164 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Encore](https://selfhost.directory/project/encore) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/encore.md)
- [transfer.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/transfersh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/encore-vs-transfersh